I remember the first time I crawled out onto a peatland boardwalk to lift a broken board and examine what was going on beneath my boots. The smell of wet peat, the tiny bells of hare’s-tail cottongrass and the distant cry of curlew made it clear this was not a place to rush. Boardwalks over blanket bog and fens are lifelines for walkers and wildlife alike—keeping feet dry, vegetation protected and erosion at bay—but they’re also exposed and often repaired by volunteers with more good will than formal carpentry training. This short guide sets out what I’ve learned: the materials that work, safe techniques to use on site, and the permissions you should check before you start.
Why repair matters (and what to check first)
Peatlands are fragile. A crushed hummock or a widened path quickly becomes a channel for water and a seedbed for further damage. A damaged boardwalk can channel walkers onto vegetation, accelerating peat erosion. Before you pick up a tool, take a few minutes to assess:
If the boardwalk is on protected or managed land, contact the land manager or relevant statutory body first (e.g. Natural England, NatureScot, NRW). Many managers welcome volunteer help but will want to record work, ensure compatibility with restoration aims, and advise on approved materials.
Permissions and risk: the boxes to tick
Never assume "it’s just a board." The two most common headaches I’ve seen are volunteers taking action without consent, and volunteers exposing themselves to risk without simple mitigations. Do the following before any repair:
Materials: what I reach for and why
The right materials balance durability, low maintenance and low ecological impact. Here are the options I commonly use, with pros and cons.
| Material | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Tanalised (pressure-treated) softwood | Widely available, inexpensive, good rot resistance, easy to screw/plane | Treated timber can leach chemicals (avoid where water flows into sensitive bog pools); limited lifespan in constantly wet conditions |
| British-grown oak or larch | Natural durability, good aesthetics, longer life than softwood | Expensive and heavy; harder to work on site |
| Recycled plastic/composite decking | Doesn’t rot, long life, low maintenance | Higher cost, potential heat expansion, may look out of place in wild setting |
| Galvanised steel bearers/joists | Extremely durable for joists, keeps timber off wet peat | Adds cost and weight; requires skilled fixings |
For short volunteer repairs I often choose pressure-treated softwood boards for replacements and stainless steel fixings. If the site is part of a long-term restoration where metal contamination or chemicals are a concern, the land manager will advise suitable alternatives.
Tools and small kit I bring
On-site technique: a practical, low-impact sequence
I follow a cautious routine that protects habitat and makes the work last.
Common repairs and quick fixes
These are the repairs I’ve been called to most often and how I approach them:
Minimising environmental impact while working
Work slowly, avoid creating new paths, and keep disturbance to a minimum. A few practical rules I follow:
Reporting back and planning for the long term
Repairs are often temporary unless funded and planned. I always send the land manager a short report with photos, GPS location and an estimate of how long the fix will last. If the path is in high use, suggest a scheduled maintenance plan and discuss better long-term materials (e.g. replaced joists lifted off peat, composite boards or steel supports). Most managers value volunteer work but will be grateful for clear information that helps them plan budget and conservation priorities.